{"id":2435,"date":"2024-06-10T16:14:50","date_gmt":"2024-06-10T15:14:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/?page_id=2435"},"modified":"2025-09-03T03:52:56","modified_gmt":"2025-09-03T03:52:56","slug":"events-and-activities-2024","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/?page_id=2435","title":{"rendered":"Events and Activities 2024"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Peer Review Week 2024 included many exciting events, including events and activities organised by a host of organisations. These are categorised under the headings below. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Activities included blog posts, videos, podcasts, infographics, and more. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>IN-PERSON EVENTS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Celebration of Peer Review Week 2024 by Dr. S. R. Lasker Library, Bangladesh<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Dr. S. R. Lasker Library, East West University (EWU), Dhaka, Bangladesh has launched an awareness building campaign titled &#8220;Avoiding Predatory Publishing.&#8221; This campaign is aimed at newly appointed faculty members and young researchers within the EWU community.<br>The library has established a booth within its premises to highlight the significant role of peer review in upholding research standards, offer strategies for recognizing and steering clear of predatory publishing practices, and explore the integration of AI technology in the peer review process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/lib.ewubd.edu\/article\/celebration-peer-review-week-prw-2024-dr-s-r-lasker-library\">Visit the Dr. S. R. Lasker Library website<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser: <\/strong>Dr. S. R. Lasker Library, East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh <strong>Contact:<\/strong> shaharima@ewubd.edu<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>ONLINE EVENTS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Navigating Challenges in Peer Review: Perspectives from University Presses and Associations<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 14:00 UTC-4<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Join us for a dynamic and insightful webinar featuring perspectives from universities, university presses, associations, and peer reviewers. This session will delve into the complexities and evolving landscape of peer review in scholarly publishing. Peer review is a cornerstone of academic integrity, but it comes with its own set of challenges, including reviewer selection, maintaining impartiality, and managing reviewer workloads. Our distinguished panel will share their experiences and strategies for overcoming these obstacles, ensuring high-quality and unbiased reviews.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/orcid-org.zoom.us\/rec\/share\/VydBJSCFrRgm2FgLX9IPVJIJV4YC2h7YgfajrUD46fjsCdsqN_2ckBMgQpZWOQ_d.XYzmXe3mgzkr1OXU?startTime=1727200821000\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> ORCID <strong>Contact:<\/strong> meetings@orcid.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Demonstration of Eliza, the AI-supported peer-review tool<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, Repeated in two time zones &#8211; 10:00 (CET\/EU and Asia) and 20:00 (CET)(US)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this webinar we will introduce &#8216;Eliza&#8217;, the first AI-driven peer review tool. Eliza uses the latest NLP-technology (incl. LLM and semantic matching) for analysing both papers submitted to journals or conferences and first peer review drafts in order to provide valuable feedback to the peer-reviewer for improving his\/her report. Eliza also facilitates the editorial decision process by presenting concise information to the editor after the peer-review reports are ready for better and faster decision making. The webinar will first discuss the main features of Eliza and then demonstrate the tool itself. After this, we are open to discuss Eliza with the participants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/vimeo.com\/1014239173\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Z Karssen <strong>Contact: <\/strong>zkarssen@world-brain.eu<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer review in Review: What&#8217;s coming in Open Journal Systems (OJS)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 09:00 Pacific Time<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Approaches to peer review are evolving, with the focus shifting towards greater transparency, efficiency, and collaboration. The Public Knowledge Project (PKP) is pleased to invite you to a free and open Peer Review Week webinar to learn about how Open Journal Systems (OJS) is adapting to these changes. Topics include (1) planning and brainstorming insights, (2) upcoming developments, and (3) community engagement opportunities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/pkp.sfu.ca\/2024\/09\/26\/pkp-peer-review-week-webinar-recording-now-available\/\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Public Knowledge Project (PKP) <strong>Contact:<\/strong> commpkp@sfu.ca<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Review Quality Collector: Reviewing as a source of reputation<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 14:00 &#8211; 15:30 CET<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The session is a presentation of the Review Quality Collector (RQC) Initiative that was developed in Berlin some years ago and will include a discussion on the quality of peer review. Furthermore, it will be discussed to what extent the RQC can contribute to the recognition of peer review in terms of reputation building and to a holistic understanding in the assessment of research performance. For more details, please check out the Berlin University Alliance&#8217;s website.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Berlin University Alliance <strong>Contact:<\/strong> nele.hofmann@berlin-university-alliance.de<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Envisioning a Hybrid Model of Peer Review: Integrating AI with reviewers, publishers, &amp; authors<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 13:00 GMT<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is much debate surrounding the integration of AI in peer review with some for it and some against. However, the future does not hinge on a simple yes or no but rather on a nuanced approach\u2014a new hybrid model of peer review, perhaps? In this session, we examine this shift and envision a collaborative environment where human expertise and AI complement each other to enhance the peer review process. Addressing ethical implications and guidelines for AI deployment, the panel explores training and resources necessary for reviewers to effectively use these AI tools.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/live\/YzJIiu_SMxE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage in partnership with EASE <strong>Contact:<\/strong> aditi.agarwal@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Publisher-Independent Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 15:00 (Lisbon time)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Join a group of publisher agnostic scholarly communications professionals discussing the role of technology in driving innovative ideas within the peer review sphere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/vimeo.com\/1015525009\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Sci-Train <strong>Contact:<\/strong> machado.mjc@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Artificial Intelligence and Scholarly Publications: Expectations, Equity and Ethics<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 11:00 ET<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Join the American Society for Microbiology as we discuss AI&#8217;s role in scholarly publishing. The ethical and responsible conduct of the peer review process is integral to upholding and maintaining trust in scholarly publishing, as it ensures the integrity, reliability, and credibility of academic research and the dissemination of knowledge. Learn more about reviewer responsibilities, ethical guidelines, available resources and new challenges introduced by the increasing use of AI in scholarly publishing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/northwestern.zoom.us\/rec\/share\/wagvyJv6Y8IXqgYa-rQjWy826hxIt5z4Co_cvILEV1lCv4MrlWkFkNlw1s5W9kfU.TbA3SUluZ_bPiMrV\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> ASM Journals <strong>Contact:<\/strong> mvoigt@asmusa.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A Roundtable Discussion on Innovation and Technology in Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 15:00 CEST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We are pleased to present this roundtable discussion, co-moderated by Dr. Ioana Craciun, MDPI&#8217;s Scientific Communications Specialist, and Dr. Enric Sayas, MDPI&#8217;s AI Business Analyst, featuring a panel of scholars and industry experts.<br><br>This year we will explore the concept of &#8220;Innovation and Technology in Peer Review,&#8221; a theme chosen through a global poll to represent the collective voice of the academic world.<br>Join us for this event and watch our panelists share their experiences and insights into the future of publishing, and the essential role of peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The main topics for discussion will include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Exploring available tools that are driving innovation<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Assessing the benefits and challenges associated with integrating AI within the peer review process<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What is currently in the pipeline?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What can we expect in the future of peer review?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> MDPI <strong>Contact:<\/strong> lyndsay.grieder@mdpi.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">PREreview Live Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Friday, 27 September 2024, 9:00 PDT \/ 12:00 EDT \/ 16:00 UTC<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PREreview and JMIR Publications are joining forces to explore ways to improve the traditional peer-review process by engaging the research community. We hope you will take part in a community Live Review that aims to be open, time-efficient, scientifically rigorous, fair, balanced, and inclusive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Live Review will be hosted by two facilitators who will guide all participants through a constructive discussion of the preprint following a curated template. The event will last 90 minutes and yield a review based on the collaborative notes participants will jointly take during the call. The review will be shared and published on PREreview.org under a CC BY 4.0 license. Participants will have the option to receive credit for their participation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> PREreview and JMIR Publications <strong>Contact:<\/strong> community@prereview.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">From global to local: PREreview community design sprint on localization and translation (English and Brazilian Portuguese)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Thursday, 26 September 2024, 9:00 PT \/12:00 ET \/ 16:00 UTC<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From global to local: PREreview community design sprint on localization and translation (English and Brazilian Portuguese) \/ De global a local: Sprint de design da comunidade PREreview sobre localiza\u00e7\u00e3o e tradu\u00e7\u00e3o (ingl\u00eas e portugu\u00eas brasileiro)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To kick off Peer Review Week 2024, we\u2019re starting the translation of PREreview.org and our preprint review resources into Latin American Spanish (ES LatAm) and Brazilian Portuguese (PT-BR). Your feedback will guide this effort, helping us make our work more globally accessible.<br>Para iniciar a Peer Review Week 2024, come\u00e7aremos a tradu\u00e7\u00e3o do PREreview.org e dos nossos recursos de revis\u00e3o de preprints para o portugu\u00eas brasileiro (PT BR) e para o espanhol latino-americano (ES LatAm). Seu feedback guiar\u00e1 este esfor\u00e7o, ajudando-nos a tornar nosso trabalho mais acess\u00edvel globalmente.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> PREreview <strong>Contact:<\/strong> community@prereview.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">From global to local: PREreview community design sprint on localization and translation (English and Spanish)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 9:00 PT \/12:00 ET \/ 16:00 UTC<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From global to local: PREreview community design sprint on localization and translation (English and Spanish) \/ De global a local: Sprint de dise\u00f1o de la comunidad PREreview sobre localizaci\u00f3n y traducci\u00f3n (ingl\u00e9s y espa\u00f1ol)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To kick off Peer Review Week 2024, we\u2019re starting the translation of PREreview.org and our preprint review resources into Latin American Spanish (ES LatAm) and Brazilian Portuguese (PT-BR). Your feedback will guide this effort, helping us make our work more globally accessible.<br>Para iniciar la Peer Review Week 2024, comenzaremos la traducci\u00f3n de PREreview.org y nuestros recursos de revisi\u00f3n de preprints al espa\u00f1ol latinoamericano (ES LatAm) y al portugu\u00e9s brasile\u00f1o (PT-BR). Tus comentarios guiar\u00e1n este esfuerzo, ayud\u00e1ndonos a hacer nuestro trabajo m\u00e1s accesible a nivel global.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> PREreview <strong>Contact:<\/strong> community@prereview.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The past, present, and future of peer review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 09:00 PT \/ 12:00 ET \/ 16:00 UTC<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One-third of scientists believe peer review needs a complete overhaul. Ecologist Dr. David Green of Stacks Journal will discuss how we got our current peer review system, why it feels like it\u2019s breaking down, and how we can improve it for future generations of researchers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/cXntjPNNR3U\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> David Green, Stacks Journal <strong>Contact:<\/strong> david@stacksjournal.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Open peer review of preprints on VeriXiv: towards a publish, review, curate model of scholarly communication<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Friday, 27 September 2024, 08:00 PDT \/ 10:00 CDT \/ 11:00 EDT \/ 16:00 BST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VeriXiv is a preprint server that has been built by F1000 in partnership with the Gates Foundation. Gates-funded authors have the option of submitting preprints for open peer review on VeriXiv, followed by final publication and curation in a linked outlet, starting (in 2024) with Gates Open Research. We will discuss the unique aspects of VeriXiv\u2019s post-publication open peer review model and why open posting of reviews is valuable both for authors and for reviewers. This will also include a discussion of the publish, review, curate model and the Gates Foundation\u2019s 2025 Open Access policy refresh, which aims to advance this model by requiring Gates grantees to publish their outputs as a preprint ahead of final publication in a peer reviewed venue. A Q&amp;A will follow the main presentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> F1000 <strong>Contact: <\/strong>george.cooper@tandf.co.uk<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">AI-assisted Peer Review: Using innovative technologies with human oversight<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Thursday, 26 September 2024, 08:00 ET<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Register now to secure your spot in our live webinar, where experts will discuss cutting-edge technologies in peer review and outline their responsible use. Don\u2019t miss this opportunity to learn how to effectively integrate AI while maintaining essential human oversight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Enago <strong>Contact: <\/strong>academy@enago.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer Review 101: Responding Effectively to Reviews<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 15:30 Eastern Daylight Time<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You\u2019re ready to submit your first paper to a journal. What happens after that? What exactly is \u201cpeer review\u201d? This interactive workshop, incorporating examples from cognitive science, will pull back the curtain to help you understand how peer review works and provide you with concrete tools for responding to a wide range of reviews \u2013 from constructive feedback to unprofessional comments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/northwestern.zoom.us\/rec\/share\/wagvyJv6Y8IXqgYa-rQjWy826hxIt5z4Co_cvILEV1lCv4MrlWkFkNlw1s5W9kfU.TbA3SUluZ_bPiMrV\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Reviewer Zero <strong>Contact:<\/strong> admin@reviewerzero.net<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Innovations in Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Thursday, 26 September 2024, 11:00 &#8211; 12:30 ET<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dr. Gareth Dyke, Learning &amp; Development Advisor and Business Development Executive for PeerReviewMe.org, will discuss the commercialization of peer review compared to the commercialization of IRBs in the 1990s, focusing on the innovative five-step peer review certification process and portable peer review services offered by PeerReviewMe.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Council of Science Editors &amp; PeerReviewMe.org <strong>Contact:<\/strong> silvia.ibrean@yahoo.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Publishing Fundamentals Webinar: Peer review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 14:00-15:30 BST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To celebrate Peer Review Week, the Microbiology Society is pleased to offer a Publishing Fundamentals webinar, freely available for everyone to attend, dedicated to the key role peer review plays in academic publishing to help attendees understand how peer review works, how reviewers should behave, how authors should respond and what editors look for when evaluating peer review reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Microbiology Society <strong>Contact:<\/strong> a.monica@microbiologysociety.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer Review @ USU<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 13:30 Mountain Daylight Time<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Join USU Libraries for a virtual panel discussion focused on academic peer review, featuring USU-based journal editors from various disciplines. We will explore what constitutes a good peer review, how to respond to and incorporate peer review feedback, and include time for audience Q&amp;A. If you are interested in engaging in academic publishing as an author, reviewer, or editor, this panel is for you!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Utah State University Libraries <strong>Contact:<\/strong> erica.finch@usu.edu<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Innovation, Technology, and AI: Revolutionizing Peer Review &amp; Publishing<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 11:00 ET<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Join Pavithra Naullage, Assistant Managing Editor at ACS Publications, for an introduction to peer review at ACS, as well as Jyotishman Dasgupta, Editorial Advisory Board Member for The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Sarbajit Banerjee, Senior Editor of ACS Omega, and Z. Jason Ren, Associate Editor, ES&amp;T, ES&amp;T Letters as they share their perspectives on the future of peer review and the evolving landscape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> American Chemical Society <strong>Contact:<\/strong> k_corl@acs.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to Be the Reviewer You Want to Have<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Monday, 23 September 2024, 15:00 EDT<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While peer review plays a vital role in shaping scholarly communication, not all scientists receive training on how to review a scientific paper. In celebration of Peer Review Week 2024, Dr. Gail Bishop, Editor-in-Chief of The Journal of Immunology, will present best practices for peer review. This webinar is suitable for graduate students, early post-doctoral fellows, and anyone who wants to gain more experience reviewing scientific manuscripts. Time will be allotted to answer attendees\u2019 questions regarding peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> The American Association of Immunologists <strong>Contact:<\/strong> efox@aai.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ISMTE Webinar: Reviewer Burnout and AI<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 09:00 EDT<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviewer burnout has become a significant challenge in scholarly publishing as the pace and volume of submissions continually increases, which can lead to disruptions to the peer review process as the demand for high-quality reviews persists.<br>In this webinar, three panelists will discuss key factors leading to reviewer fatigue in today\u2019s publishing environment and the solutions Artificial Intelligence (AI) can provide to address this issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> ISMTE <strong>Contact:<\/strong> info@ismte.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer Review 101: Build Expertise, Become a Peer Reviewer<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 15:00 IST, 11:30 SAST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This session is open to researchers at all career stages, especially those interested in contributing to academic scholarship as peer reviewers. Whether you\u2019re a seasoned researcher or early in your career, this bootcamp will provide you with the tools and knowledge to create, review, and share quality research in your field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/attendee.gotowebinar.com\/recording\/830951956800777386\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser: <\/strong>Taylor &amp; Francis Group <strong>Contact:<\/strong> jatin.julka@tandfindia.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Strengthening Scholarly Publishing in the Global South: Empowering Society Journals to Advance Peer Review and Publishing Practices<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Thursday, 26 September 2024, 18:00 IST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For the upcoming Peer Review Week on the theme \u2018Innovation and Technology in Peer Review\u2019, Urbanisation brings to you the next panel discussion in our webinar series.<br>Through this discussion, we plan to bring to the fore the various concerns of society journal publishers, who self-publish and run on a not-for-profit basis, such as access to funding and infrastructure, and keeping up with trends and technologies in scholarly publishing and peer review. We anticipate that this session will tease out practical solutions, innovative approaches, and collaborative strategies to help address these challenges. By engaging with journal editors and publishing experts from India who have first-hand experience navigating these issues, attendees will gain insights into how society journals can leverage new technologies, improve peer review quality, and enhance their visibility and impact in the global academic community.<br>Join us for this timely and important discussion on innovating peer review and empowering scholarly publishing in the global South.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Uxw1EXq6OOw\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Urbanisation Journal <strong>Contact:<\/strong> editor@urbanisationjournal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Understanding Peer Review (Mandarin Chinese)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Friday, 27 Sep 2024, 19:00 Beijing CST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The peer review process is an essential aspect of academic research and publishing, playing a pivotal role in maintaining the quality and integrity of scholarly articles. It can be a challenging journey for researchers, but understanding and effectively navigating this process is crucial for professional growth.<br>In this webinar, we will will walk you through each step of the peer review process, shedding light on its significance, challenges, and best practices, offering valuable guidance to researchers at all stages of their careers. Whether you are a seasoned researcher or just starting out, this event aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the peer review process and equip you with practical strategies to navigate it successfully.<br>Who will attend?<br>Early-career researchers: Graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and researchers who are new to the peer review process and seeking guidance on navigating it effectively.<br>Anyone interested in scholarly publishing: Individuals interested in the academic publishing world, including librarians, students, and individuals from related industries.<br>Please feel free to share in your Mandarin-speaking network!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Every Author Publishing Hong Kong <strong>Contact:<\/strong> info@everyauthorpub.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Human-Centered AI in Peer Review: Risks, Trends, and Best Practices<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuesday, 24 September 2024,15.00 BST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this insightful session, we\u2019ll explore current trends relating to the use of AI tools in the peer review process and the role of human-centered AI in peer review. Our expert speakers, Martin Delahunty, director, Inspiring STEM Consulting, and Haripriya Bharath, head, Editorial Services, Amnet ContentSource, will talk about:<br>\u25cf Integrating AI into existing peer review workflows.<br>\u25cf Leveraging natural language processing to recommend relevant reviewers.<br>\u25cf Ethical considerations while using AI tools in the peer review process.<br>\u25cf Mitigating potential risks and biases in AI-powered peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Amnet ContentSource <strong>Contact:<\/strong> hello@amnet-systems.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to do Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 19:00 (Riyadh time)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>How to:<br>&#8211; Provide constructive feedback<br>&#8211; Enhance critical thinking<br>&#8211; Contribute to your field<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences (JTUMED) <strong>Contact<\/strong>: jtumed.eic@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to Survive Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Saturday, 28 September, 19:00 (Riyadh time)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>How to:<br>&#8211; Decode reviewer comments<br>&#8211; Revise effectively<br>&#8211; Boost your publication success<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences (JTUMED) <strong>Contact<\/strong>: jtumed.eic@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">AUPresses Peer Review Week Virtual Event &#8211; AI, Video Calls, and Beyond: Exploring Technological Advances in Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 12:00 EDT<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Join us for the Peer Review Week 2024 discussion, where we dive into the intersection of innovation and technology to address these pressing issues. This session will explore how acquisitions editors are leveraging video calls and emerging AI tools to support peer reviewers, authors, and press colleagues throughout the peer review process. Panelists will discuss practical ways to use technology to facilitate the exchange of academic ideas, and will open a discussion about potential uses of AI now and in the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Acquisitions Editorial Committee of Association of University Presses (AUPresses) <strong>Contact:<\/strong> awindhorn@aupresses.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer Review Week 2024 | The Future of Peer Review is Now: Kriyadocs and Global Campus&#8217; Collaboration for Innovation<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Friday, 27 September 2024, 15:00 CET<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Join Kriyadocs and Global Campus as they dive into the challenges of peer review workflows today. Discover how personalized, targeted approaches can improve reviewer engagement, reduce rejection rates, and streamline peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Don&#8217;t miss this critical discussion on reshaping peer review processes for the future!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/KVYw9Ysy2Ds\">Access the recording<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Kriyadocs and Global Campus <strong>Contact:<\/strong> janani.k@kriyadocs.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>BLOGS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Meet Roohi Ghosh \u2014 Co-chair of Peer Review Week 2024<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>I share with you the interview blog conducted with Roohi Ghosh, co-chair of Peer Review Week 2024! In this interview, Roohi shares her insights about this year&#8217;s theme, &#8220;Innovation and Technology in Peer Review&#8221;, shedding light on innovation and technology in peer review activities. Don&#8217;t miss the full interview that promises to inspire and inform!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/communities.springernature.com\/posts\/meet-roohi-ghosh-co-chair-of-peer-review-week-2024\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Dorsaf Sebai <strong>Contact:<\/strong> sebaidorsaf@yahoo.fr<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Writing clear language makes peer review easier &#8211; here&#8217;s how AI can help<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>A well-written paper is easier to evaluate, as one doesn&#8217;t have to dig deep to find the intended meaning of the text. Yet writing clear language isn&#8217;t so easy. In this blog post I outline AI strategies to edit manuscripts, so they are easier to read and review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/10000words.nl\/ai-strategies-for-clear-language\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Rosanna van Hespen <strong>Contact:<\/strong> rosanna@10000words.nl<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer review from a researcher\u2019s perspective<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Maria draws upon her extensive experience as a writer, peer reviewer, and auditor to highlight some of the peer review issues faced by researchers and editors along with her recommendations for solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.maverick-os.com\/news-events\/news\/peer-review-from-a-researchers-perspective\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Maverick Publishing Specialists <strong>Contact:<\/strong> machado.mjc@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Ethical Considerations in Digital Peer Review: Balancing Innovation and Integrity<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The article discusses the ethical considerations in digital peer review, highlighting the need to balance innovation with integrity as digital technologies reshape manuscript evaluation. Key issues include ensuring data privacy, maintaining reviewer anonymity, upholding integrity, and facilitating inclusive and equitable access. <br>Please note: This blog will be available from 23 September.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/novatechset.com\/blogs\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Nova Techset Ltd. <strong>Contact:<\/strong> info@novatechset.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Expert Finder: Upholding Research Integrity Through Advanced Peer Reviewer Selection<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Peer review is fundamental to maintaining research integrity and advancing scientific knowledge. Top researchers, with their deep subject matter expertise and broad interdisciplinary understanding, are essential as peer reviewers due to their ability to identify methodological flaws and provide credible evaluations. Tools like Scinapse&#8217;s Expert Finder streamline the process of locating such experts, ensuring that peer reviews are both relevant and diverse. This contributes to upholding rigorous research standards and enhancing the quality of scientific publications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/insights.pluto.im\/peer-reviewer-upholding-research-integrity\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Pluto Labs &#8211; Research Trends Insights <strong>Contact:<\/strong> uttkarshab9@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Innovative Peer Review Models: Enhancing efficiency of the peer review process<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Explore cutting-edge peer review models designed to tackle the challenges of traditional processes. Discover how these innovative approaches can significantly enhance efficiency, streamline workflows, and improve overall review quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-week-2024\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Enago <strong>Contact: <\/strong>academy@enago.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to become a good reviewer<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>At the end of #PeerReviewWeek2023, my first full one, I was tired but thrilled. Here I go into detail into the process of conducting a peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/stories4sci.blogspot.com\/2023\/09\/peerreviewweek2023.html\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Stories4Sci <strong>Contact:<\/strong> machado.mjc@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer\/Content Review: the Q&amp;A<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The what, when, why, and how of peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/stories4sci.blogspot.com\/2023\/07\/peercontent-review-q.html\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Stories4Sci <strong>Contact:<\/strong> machado.mjc@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">AI-Assisted Peer Reviewer Selection: Addressing and Overcoming the Shortage in Scholarly Publishing<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Dearth of peer reviewers is a concern as research volumes increase; thus, AI-assisted peer reviewer selection emerges as a promising solution to this growing peer review crisis. With this article, I bring to you an approach that aims to streamline the peer review process, reduce delays, and maintain the quality of published research, ultimately benefiting the entire scientific community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/insights.pluto.im\/ai-assisted-peer-reviewer-selection\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Uttkarsha Bhosale <strong>Contact:<\/strong> uttkarshab9@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">AI in Peer Review: A Catalyst for Scientific Advancement<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition to the publication of a new blog post on our website exploring the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in peer review, we invite all team members to a dedicated meeting to further discuss this topic and its implications for our research at ENTRO. During the meeting, we will delve deeper into the potential benefits of AI in peer review and explore how we can leverage this technology to advance our own research endeavors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/entro.ir\/2024\/09\/12\/ai-in-peer-review\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Arash Pakravesh <strong>Contact:<\/strong> Pakravesh@entro.ir<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Innovation in peer review through collaboration: an interview with prophy and Karger Publishers<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Publishers of all sizes need to innovate as the number of manuscripts submitted and published each year grows. Maintaining research integrity at this scale requires embracing technology to support, but not replace, the human element. <br>In this interview, Karger Publishers&#8217; Research Integrity \/ Publication Ethics Manager and Prophy&#8217;s co-founder and COO discuss the challenges and opportunities laying ahead and how working together will ultimately pave the way forward guaranteeing a future of robust peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This blog will be published on 25 September.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/researchviewpoints.karger.com\/\">View the blog<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Karger Publishers <strong>Contact:<\/strong> g.mcnamara@karger.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How ASHA Journals Are Using Technology: Peer Review Week 2024<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In recognition of Peer Review Week, we\u2019re reviewing how AI and other technologies are used at ASHA Journals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/academy.pubs.asha.org\/context\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> ASHA Journals Context Blog <strong>Contact:<\/strong> fwisswell@asha.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Inside Peer Review: A Special 5-Part Blog Series<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>JMIR Publications is excited to launch our special 5-part blog series: Inside Peer Review: A Special 5 Part Series. Over the course of Peer Review Week we\u2019ll dive into essential topics for peer reviewers, including insights for early career researchers, the art of high-quality reviews, inclusive language, ethical considerations, and the impact of AI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.jmir.org\/?__hstc=236487962.df774679c643d6f6fd489037e8c69a35.1695060447159.1726771140657.1726777715295.1007&amp;__hssc=236487962.1.1726777715295&amp;__hsfp=3627107993\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> JMIR Publications <strong>Contact:<\/strong> jane.kelly@jmir.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">(Interview) Research integrity in the age of innovation and technology: A conversation with Laura Etchells<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Having recently taken on the role of Head of Research Integrity at Emerald Publishing, we sat down with Laura Etchells to discuss the crucial role peer reviewing plays in maintaining the integrity of the research we publish, the current state of play and the challenges that lie ahead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com\/opinion-and-blog\/research-integrity-age-innovation-and-technology-a-conversation-laura-etchells\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Penny Trees <strong>Contact:<\/strong> ptrees@emerald.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CABI reflects on Peer Review Week 2024<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>CABI reflects on Peer Review Week 2024, including the success of CABI Agriculture and Bioscience\u2019s Editor training and mentoring programme and the incorporation of the Web of Science Reviewer Recognition service into journal submission systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cabidigitallibrary.org\/do\/10.5555\/news-peer-review-week-2024\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Maria Campbell, Marketing Manager, CABI <strong>Contact:<\/strong> m.campbell@cabi.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Innovation and technology in peer review: The case of Living with Machines<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>We will publish a blog post outlining some of our learnings so far from an open peer review process we&#8217;ve been running for one of the University of London Press&#8217; own open access book projects, Living with Machines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the hugely important research project of the same name, Living with Machines is at the cutting edge of Digital History. Collectively written by the project\u2019s large, multidisciplinary research team, the highly collaborative nature of the book makes it an ideal candidate for the kind of open peer review model we wanted to trial. The open review is taking place iteratively during 2024 and we are releasing early drafts of the book chapters for review in three phases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/uolpress.co.uk\/2024\/09\/innovation-and-technology-in-peer-review-the-case-of-living-with-machines\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> University of London Press <strong>Contact:<\/strong> katharine.nelson@sas.ac.uk<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">False Positives and Red Flags: Navigating AI in Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The rise of AI detectors has led to concerns about their reliability, as they often produce false positives and can unfairly disadvantage non-native English speakers. Instead of focusing on whether a paper was written by AI, reviewers and authors should prioritize the quality and clarity of the content. Ethical use of AI in research involves respecting confidentiality and copyright, and ensuring thorough, unbiased evaluations of the work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/perspectivesblog.sagepub.com\/blog\/false-positives-and-red-flags-navigating-ai-in-peer-review?utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=peerreviewweek.wordpress.com&amp;utm_campaign=auth_awa_awab_prw2024\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Sage<strong> Contact:<\/strong> sean.scarisbrick@sagepub.com <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A Technology Wishlist from the Sage Research Integrity Team<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Interest in research integrity has surged due to the rise of paper mills, AI, and frequent data manipulation scandals. Sage\u2019s Research Integrity team is exploring advanced technology to manage these challenges. Their wish list includes AI detection tools, email verification systems, and conflict of interest databases to enhance efficiency and uphold ethical standards in academic publishing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/perspectivesblog.sagepub.com\/blog\/a-technology-wishlist-from-the-sage-research-integrity-team?utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=peerreviewweek.wordpress.com&amp;utm_campaign=auth_awa_awab_prw2024\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Sage<strong> Contact:<\/strong> sean.scarisbrick@sagepub.com <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The role of artificial intelligence in research exchange<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>This is a blog that discusses how Wiley are developing systems where human expertise meets AI-driven innovation to shape a more efficient and inclusive manuscript submission process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wiley.com\/en-us\/network\/publishing\/research-publishing\/peer-review\/the-role-of-artificial-intelligence-in-research-exchange\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Wiley <strong>Contact:<\/strong> a.sealy@wiley.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Future of Peer Review is Now: Kriyadocs and Global Campus&#8217; Collaboration for Innovation<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Kriyadocs and Global Campus are collaborating to address key challenges in peer review, from reviewer fatigue to improving engagement. Together, they aim to make the process more efficient and inclusive for publishers and reviewers alike. Read this blog to learn how Kriyadocs and Global Campus are working to reshape peer review for the better!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kriyadocs.com\/blogs\/the-future-of-peer-review-is-now-kriyadocs-and-global-campus-collaboration-for-innovation\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Kriyadocs and Global Campus <strong>Contact:<\/strong> janani.k@kriyadocs.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Can AI contribute to a fairer and more inclusive reviewer selection?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>This blog from <em>FEBS Open Bio <\/em>spotlights a key aspect of innovation in the peer review process: improving reviewer selection to promote greater diversity and equal opportunities. Discover more about the journal\u2019s ongoing efforts to broaden their reviewer pool to create a fairer and more equitable selection process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/network.febs.org\/posts\/can-ai-contribute-to-a-fairer-and-more-inclusive-reviewer-selection\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> FEBS Open Bio <strong>Contact:<\/strong> ali@febs.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Recognizing and Rewarding Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>How should reviewers be recognized and rewarded for their efforts? Peer review is time-consuming and unpaid\u2014and vital to the scientific process. In this blog post, learn why researchers commit to review despite its drawbacks, and how systems can change to give them the recognition they deserve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.cdnsciencepub.com\/recognizing-and-rewarding-peer-review\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Canadian Science Publishing <strong>Contact: <\/strong>kristin.mcevoy@cdnsciencepub.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Beyond criticism: Creating a collective future for peer review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>At a time when trust in science is at an all-time low, does peer review have a future? Discover why Steven Cooke, esteemed biologist, editor and reviewer believes that peer review, despite its flaws, holds the key to building stronger scientific communities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.cdnsciencepub.com\/beyond-criticism\/\">View the blog<\/a> (available from 24 September)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Canadian Science Publishing <strong>Contact: <\/strong>kristin.mcevoy@cdnsciencepub.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Ensuring scientific integrity through rigorous peer review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Canadian Science Publishing, Canada&#8217;s largest not-for-profit publisher of scientific journals, has several opportunities for early career researchers to learn and grow as reviewers. In this blog post, discover our opportunities for post docs and early-career researchers to gain hands-on training in peer review while contributing to their fields.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.cdnsciencepub.com\/ensuring-scientific-integrity-through-rigorous-peer-review\/\">View the blog<\/a> (available from 25 September)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Canadian Science Publishing <strong>Contact: <\/strong>kristin.mcevoy@cdnsciencepub.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Open data and code in the physiology and pharmacology<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology now requires authors to provide access to all data and code required to reproduce statistical results, simulation results, and figures. In this blog post, learn about the importance of open data and code and what this policy means for authors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.cdnsciencepub.com\/open-data-and-code-in-physiology-and-pharmacology\">View the blog<\/a> (available from 26 September)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Canadian Science Publishing <strong>Contact: <\/strong>kristin.mcevoy@cdnsciencepub.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What\u2019s it like to be a peer reviewer?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Peer reviewing is a cornerstone of academic science, but it&#8217;s not always an obvious path for early-career researchers. How do you become a peer reviewer? What does the peer review process look like? What is it like to be a peer reviewer?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this interview, we talk to an award-winning reviewer and an early career scientist to gain their insights and hear their reflections on their experiences as reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.cdnsciencepub.com\/whats-it-like-to-be-a-peer-reviewer\">View the blog<\/a> (available from 27 September)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Canadian Science Publishing <strong>Contact: <\/strong>kristin.mcevoy@cdnsciencepub.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Q&amp;A about peer review &#8211; 5 hot topics answered<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>One of the most critical elements in the manuscript review process is peer review. It is an essential step in ensuring that the research being communicated has been vetted by an<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Peer review stage is one that leads to many questions in the minds of authors. Here we collated 5 of our popular questions and answers on the subject of peer review that have been answered on Editage Insights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/qas-about-peer-review-5-hot-topics-answered\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to draft a journal peer review report: easy steps to get you started<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Here, we have put together a handy guide to writing a peer review for a journal article, to help you craft the kind of review that is most useful to journals as well as other researchers in your field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-draft-a-journal-peer-review-report-easy-steps-to-get-you-started\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer review in the digital era: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In this post on Editage Insights, we have presented the main points of a recent article on Scholarly Kitchen by Roohi Ghosh, Co-Chair of Peer Review Week 2024. She has discussed some of the nuances of peer review&#8217;s role in the digital era. In that article, she has made an ardent appeal to academia to move beyond lip-service and superficial conversations and dig deeper into the issues surrounding the peer review process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/peer-review-in-the-digital-era-strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-and-threats\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Harnessing AI efficiencies and human expertise for enhancing editorial and peer review processes: An interview with Shilpi Mehra<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In this interview, Shilpi Mehra, who heads Research Integrity and Paperpal Preflight at CACTUS, she shares her insights into the key challenges faced by the peer review system and the role of a hybrid approach that combines Al and human insights to enhance editorial and peer review processes, while upholding the highest standards of integrity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/harnessing-ai-efficiencies-and-human-expertise-for-enhancing-editorial-and-peer-review-processes-an-interview-with-shilpi-mehra\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">To peer-review or not to peer-review: Experiences and reflections of early career researchers in navigating peer review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>It is a blog that focuses on sharing experiences and reflections of early career researchers in navigating peer review. Two researchers discuss their motivations and challenges in peer reviewing. They also share tips with fellow early career researchers on why they should or should not peer review early in their career.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/connect\/to-peer-review-or-not-to-peer-review\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Elsevier <strong>Contact:<\/strong> l.panda@elsevier.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why Sound Science Matters<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Jackie Jones, Associate Director of Editor Engagement at Wiley, asked Josephine Adams, Editor-in-Chief of Physiological Reports, for her views on the benefits of publishing sound science through open access (OA) journals with well-established peer-review and quality check policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wiley.com\/en-us\/network\/publishing\/research-publishing\/editors\/why-sound-science-matters\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Wiley <strong>Contact:<\/strong> a.sealy@wiley.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">If generative AI accelerates science, peer review needs to catch up<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Studies have increasingly shown the widespread use of generative AI in research publications. Faced with the consequent uptick in the number of publications, Simone Ragavooloo argues that editors and reviewers should embrace AI tools to undertake the heavy lifting of statistical and methodological review and to allow them to focus on areas that require human expertise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.lse.ac.uk\/impactofsocialsciences\/2024\/09\/25\/if-generative-ai-accelerates-science-peer-review-needs-to-catch-up\/\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Frontiers Research Integrity Team <strong>Contact:<\/strong> shirley.dent@frontiersin.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Manuscripts and Metadata: Peer Review in the Digital Age<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The academic world has consistently embraced technological innovations, from typewriters and online journals to citation indices and generative tools, enhancing the rigor and reach of scholarship. Digital tools have revolutionized the peer review process, making it more accessible and efficient for authors, editors, and reviewers, despite challenges like fraud and plagiarism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/perspectivesblog.sagepub.com\/blog\/manuscripts-and-metadata-peer-review-in-the-digital-age?utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=peerreviewweek.wordpress.com&amp;utm_campaign=auth_awa_awab_prw2024\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Sage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> sean.scarisbrick@sagepub.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">AI in Peer Review: The Positive, The Negative and Insights from the Research Integrity Team<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The publishing industry has always embraced technological advancements, and AI is the latest transformative force reshaping scholarly research and publication. Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the academic landscape by generating research ideas, assisting in writing, and creating review reports. As AI continues to impact peer review, it prompts us to consider how we can embrace this technology to enhance our work while addressing challenges like fraud and plagiarism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/perspectivesblog.sagepub.com\/blog\/ai-in-peer-review-the-positive-the-negative-and-insights-from-the-research-integrity-team?utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=peerreviewweek.wordpress.com&amp;utm_campaign=auth_awa_awab_prw2024\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Sage <strong>Contact: <\/strong>sean.scarisbrick@sagepub.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Harnessing technology to boost diversity, equity and inclusion in peer review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>This blog highlights the Find Reviewers Tool that scans 17 million researchers to put a diverse and inclusive selection at editors&#8217; fingertips. The scientific editorial manager and the developers of this tool explain how the tool ensures DEI while increasing the reviewer pool.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/connect\/harnessing-technology-to-boost-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-in-peer-review\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Elsevier <strong>Contact:<\/strong> l.panda@elsevier.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Spotlight on PRISM: peer review for OA Books<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>OPERAS has been actively engaged in community projects and various initiatives to explore how this changing landscape impacts peer review. Innovation can take many forms, and we at OPERAS are committed to contributing in this area. A key focus has been on developing a service that enhances the sharing of peer review information, fostering transparency in quality assurance processes. Today we would like to remind our community of the Peer Review Information Service for Monographs (PRISM), as well as our work in other peer review-related activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/operas.hypotheses.org\/7757\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> OPERAS Research Infrastructures together with projects and initiatives <strong>Contact:<\/strong> communication@operas-eu.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>TECHNOLOGY AND PEER REVIEW: AN INTERVIEW WITH DR. MARIA MACHADO<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this interview, Dr. Maria Machado, Analyst, Blogger, and Chief Changemaker at Storytelling for Science, reflects on how technology is reshaping peer review. She highlights the opportunities for efficiency while also emphasizing the critical role of fairness, transparency, and human judgement in the process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/technology-and-peer-review-an-interview-with-dr-maria-machado\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>INNOVATION IN PEER REVIEW: AN INTERVIEW WITH DR. GARETH DYKE<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In conversation with Dr. Gareth Dyke, Academic Director, ReviewerCredits, he shares his vision for how AI and technology can revolutionize peer review without replacing human expertise. He discusses the exciting potential of new tools to make reviews faster and more accessible while stressing the critical need for training and oversight in maintaining research integrity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dr-gareth-dyke-on-the-role-of-innovation-in-peer-review\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>AI AND THE FUTURE OF PEER REVIEW: AN INTERVIEW WITH MARYAM SAYAB<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Exploring the theme of Peer Review Week 2024, Maryam Sayab, Director of Communications, Asian Council of Science Editors, outlines practical strategies for overcoming resistance to change in the age of digital transformation and preparing the academic community for a future where innovation and technology can create a more efficient, transparent, and fair peer review system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/an-interview-with-maryam-sayab-ai-and-the-future-of-peer-review\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>PEER REVIEW AND RESEARCH INTEGRITY IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As AI becomes increasingly integrated into research workflows, this article dives into both the opportunities and challenges of using AI in the peer review process. The piece explores how AI tools can help address some of the systemic challenges, while highlighting critical concerns about bias, reliability, and the need for ethical frameworks to ensure AI supplements rather than replace human expertise in maintaining research integrity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/peer-review-and-research-integrity-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>AI TOOLS FOR RESEARCH: HOW TO USE AI TOOLS SMARTLY AND RESPONSIBLY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From academic writing assistants and literature search tools to image creation tools and large language models, this article provides practical guidance for researchers navigating the AI revolution, outlining how academics can responsibly use popular AI tools in the research journey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/ai-tools-for-research-how-to-use-ai-tools-smartly-and-responsibly\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>THE FUTURE OF PEER REVIEW: EXPLORING BLOCKCHAIN\u2019S POTENTIAL IN ACADEMIC WORKFLOWS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This article explores blockchain as a transformative technology for academic publishing, and how the systems could address key challenges in peer review including bias and lack of accountability. The piece covers potential applications while also addressing implementation challenges and concerns that must be overcome for widespread adoption in scholarly workflows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/the-future-of-peer-review-exploring-blockchains-potential-in-academic-workflows\">View the blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Editage <strong>Contact:<\/strong> radhika.vaishnav@cactusglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>VIDEOS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peering into Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Peering into Peer Review,&#8221; presented by ASM Journals, is now available on YouTube. In just 45 minutes, Ph.D. students and postdocs can gain insights into the peer review process and discover opportunities for aspiring reviewers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/JIVkdnsC-oA?si=R-YHdJvFO-eiPT3U\">Watch now<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser: <\/strong>The American Society for Microbiology <strong>Contact:<\/strong> mvoigt@asmusa.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer Review Week 2024: MDPI Author Insights<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>This is a video depicting our MDPI author&#8217;s insights about our peer review process. The data in the video has been calculated based on our 2024 Author Survey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=hWcBcQZz6f4\">Watch now<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Lyndsay Grieder <strong>Contact:<\/strong> lyndsay.grieder@mdpi.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer Wise Video Insight Series<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>KnowledgeWorks Global Ltd. (KGL) is proud to launch our Peer Wise series of video insights on peer review fundamentals, featuring experts from KGL Editorial and KGL Consulting. These short videos are intended for sharing by publishing professionals with journal editors, editorial boards, and stakeholders who may not be intimately familiar with recent industry innovations and disruptors or their implications.<br>Topics covered include an introduction to paper mills, AI in peer review, growing and diversifying your reviewer pool, using citation analysis to identify editorial board prospects, and automating common peer review tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kwglobal.com\/event\/prw24\/#video\">Watch now<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> KnowledgeWorks Global Ltd. <strong>Contact: <\/strong>mike.groth@kwglobal.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Finding the Right Fit &#8211; IDEA in Peer Review Selection<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The roundtable explores the increasing focus on diversity and inclusion principles within peer review, examining its impact on research quality and credibility. The experts delve into practical strategies for widening reviewer pool, overcoming resistance to change, and utilizing technology to enhance the process. The discussion also explores emerging trends and the potential future of peer review emphasizing the crucial role of human expertise and the ethical considerations surrounding AI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@ProphyAI\">Watch now<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Prophy.ai <strong>Contact:<\/strong> oleksandr.charkin@prophy.ai<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The New Journal Editor: Peer Review Week Water Cooler Chat with James Butcher<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Friday, 27 September 2024 at 11:00 EDT \/ 15:00 UTC<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From research integrity specialist to AI expert to author experience coordinator \u2014 today&#8217;s scholarly journal editor has more functions to fulfill than ever before. Who is the &#8220;new journal editor&#8221; of the 21st century? And how can they keep up with the rapid pace of change? Join Scholastica&#8217;s head of marketing and community development, Danielle Padula, and Founder of the industry-leading Journalology newsletter and consultancy, James Butcher, for a water-cooler-style chat about how the role of the journal editor is transforming and what steps editors can take to stay ahead of the curve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Axny6fMMyH0\">Watch now<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Scholastica <strong>Contact:<\/strong> dpadula@scholasticahq.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Innovation and Technology in Peer Review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Peer review is at the heart of academic publishing, safeguarding the quality and<br>integrity of intellectual work. Traditional peer review systems, however, have<br>flaws: they are slow, opaque, and occasionally biased. In this video, we will look at how<br>innovation and technology are altering peer review, making it more efficient,<br>transparent, and inclusive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=aR9bcRgV7mo\">Watch now<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> PLAnet Systems Group <strong>Contact: <\/strong>contact@planetsg.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>PODCASTS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Tech and trust in peer review: A conversation on AI and ethics with Jennifer Mahar<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tune in to learn the potential of AI to transform the peer review process and know the thoughtful initiatives taken by industry leaders like Jennifer Mahar, Executive Peer Review Manager and Client Coordinator in Origin Editorial to strike an ethical balance for ensuring its responsible use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-week-2024\/\">Listen now<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser: <\/strong>Enago Academy<strong> Contact:<\/strong> academy@enago.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>ONLINE PUBLICATIONS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Five C&#8217;s of Ethics for Peer Review in Scientific Publishing<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Peer review is crucial to scientific publishing and the advancement of academic ideas. Scholarly publishers offer guidelines to ensure the integrity of this process, guided by ethical standards such as those from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). ASM outlines the &#8220;5 C\u2019s of Ethical Peer Review&#8221; and provides a foundational approach to upholding these standards. @ASMicrobiology<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/asm.org\/Articles\/2023\/June\/Five-Cs-Ethical-Peer-Review-Scientific-Publishing\">More information<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser: <\/strong>The American Society for Microbiology <strong>Contact:<\/strong> mvoigt@asmusa.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Innovation, Technology, and the pace of change<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Are you a champion for change or does it feel like innovation is someone else\u2019s job at your workplace? Everyone can cultivate an innovator\u2019s mindset for themselves and in their organisation. Read on for industry insights and developments in 2024 across innovation and change management, researcher attitudes about peer review, and the ethical use of AI in research and scholarly communication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchinformation.info\/analysis-opinion\/innovation-technology-and-pace-change\">View the article<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organisers:<\/strong> Maria Machado and Anne Stone <strong>Contact:<\/strong> machado.mjc@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Improving Peer Review With Technological Innovations: A comparative analysis of AI tools<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>This listicle delves into the latest AI tools transforming the peer review process, offering a detailed comparison of their features and effectiveness. Readers will gain insights into how these innovations can enhance efficiency, streamline workflows, and assist in delivering thorough, high-quality reviews.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-week-2024\/\">View the article<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Enago <strong>Contact: <\/strong>academy@enago.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Revolutionizing Peer Review: Key findings from Enago&#8217;s global study<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Uncover the groundbreaking insights from Enago&#8217;s latest global study on research integrity. This white paper will discuss the critical role peer reviewers play in maintaining high standards and how innovative technologies can empower it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-week-2024\/\">View the article<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Enago <strong>Contact: <\/strong>academy@enago.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Peer Review Journey: From manual to AI-assisted review<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Explore the evolution of peer review technologies with this FREE downloadable resource. Discover how AI is transforming the process and gain insights on leveraging these advancements to foster a more ethical and efficient future in peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-week-2024\/\">View the infographic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Enago <strong>Contact: <\/strong>academy@enago.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Ethical AI and Technology in Peer Review: A comprehensive checklist for reviewers<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Book your copy of our FREE downloadable checklist to learn the latest ethical standards for using technology in peer review. Ensure your use of AI and other tools aligns with best practices and upholds the integrity of your review responsibilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.enago.com\/academy\/peer-review-week-2024\/\">View the checklist<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Enago <strong>Contact: <\/strong>academy@enago.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer Review in a Nutshell<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Did you ever wonder what reviewers ask for in a research paper? Have you included the pertinent information in the relevant section? Use this resource and let me know how it works for you!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.12741060\">View the preprint<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Stories4Sci <strong>Contact:<\/strong> machado.mjc@gmail.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Spotlight article: Peer Review Week: Recognition For Reviewers<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Hogrefe journals collaborate with the Web of Science Reviewer Recognition Service to support reviewers and ensure they receive the recognition they deserve for their peer review contributions. The Reviewer Recognition Service enables contributors to track, verify, and showcase their work for promotion and use in funding applications. It is seamlessly integrated into each journal\u2019s Editorial Manager system so reviewers can opt-in to have their completed reviews automatically added to the Web of Science Researcher Profile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hogrefe.com\/eu\/article\/peer-review-week\">View the article<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Spencer McGrath\/Hogrefe <strong>Contact:<\/strong> spencer.mcgrath@hogrefe.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Free guide: The Peer Review System Migration Toolkit<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Are you preparing to transition to a new journal peer review management system? You&#8217;ve found your go-to guide! This Toolkit features a &#8220;Peer Review System Migration Handbook&#8221; and accompanying &#8220;Migration Coordination Checklist&#8221; that breaks down the key software transition phases and action steps, including how to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Organize your migration leadership team and manage stakeholders<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Establish a migration timeline and ensure critical steps are complete<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Adhere to data cleaning and archiving best practices<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Successfully onboard new peer review system users<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Optimize your new peer review system pre- and post-migration<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lp.scholasticahq.com\/peer-review-system-migration-toolkit\/\">Get your copy<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Scholastica <strong>Contact:<\/strong> dpadula@scholasticahq.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Wiley Research Academy Peer Review Module Offer<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>To celebrate, we invite you to explore two Wiley Researcher Academy courses focused on peer review\u2014now both available for free for a limited time!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wileyresearcheracademy.com\/\">Access this offer<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Wiley <strong>Contact:<\/strong> asealy@wiley.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Tenth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication: Call for Abstracts.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>PRC10 officially calls for your abstract submissions! We encourage interdisciplinary research and work that aims to provide valuable insights across fields. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jama\/fullarticle\/2823861\">More information<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> JAMA and BMJ <strong>Contact:<\/strong> annette.flamagin@jamanetwork.org<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">IDEA Principles in Peer Review: A Whitepaper on Enhancing Diversity and Inclusivity in the Peer Review Process<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>This whitepaper explores the implementation of Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility (IDEA) principles in peer review. It offers practical strategies for enhancing diversity, overcoming resistance, and leveraging technology to ensure a more inclusive and credible scholarly publishing process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/posts\/prophy-ai_idea-principles-in-peer-review-a-guide-activity-7245030628717412353-kSve\/\">View the article<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Prophy.ai <strong>Contact:<\/strong> oleksandr.charkin@prophy.ai<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Future of Peer Review Technology: What\u2019s Next?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Posting: Wednesday, 25 September 2024, 11:00 IST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This carousel talks about the potential innovations like AI-driven manuscript screening, blockchain transparent review, automated reviewer suggestions and predictive analytics for manuscript success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/nova_techset?mx=2\">X<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/NovaTechset\/\">Facebook<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/in.linkedin.com\/company\/nova-techset\">LinkedIn<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/novatechset_official\/\">Instagram<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Nova Techset Ltd. <strong>Contact:<\/strong> marketing@novatechset.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which tech innovation do you believe will most significantly impact the future of peer review? (Interactive poll)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Posting: Tuesday, 24 September 2024, 11:00 IST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The post aims at seeking scholarly community&#8217;s opinion on the tech innovations that will have the biggest impact on peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/in.linkedin.com\/company\/nova-techset\">LinkedIn<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Nova Techset Ltd. <strong>Contact:<\/strong> marketing@novatechset.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">infographic post aiming to highlight how AI is revolutionizing the way we evaluate research<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Friday, 27 September 2024, 11:00 IST<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The infographic post aims to highlight how AI is revolutionizing the way we evaluate research, thereby creating efficiencies in terms of turn-around time as well as quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/nova_techset?mx=2\">X<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/NovaTechset\/\">Facebook<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/in.linkedin.com\/company\/nova-techset\">LinkedIn<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/novatechset_official\/\">Instagram<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> Nova Techset Ltd. <strong>Contact:<\/strong> marketing@novatechset.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Peer Review 3D view; Authors, Reviewers and the Editors Perspective (report of event)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The workshop was planned for a hands on session facilitated by the Editor of a prestigious Journal, 80+ participants attended the session. There was a burning discussion among participants and the facilitator. By the end, a panel discussion was held, renowned editors of Biomedical Journals responded to the queries of the authors and peer reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/share\/p\/Ta8cEgZPTnareRdS\/?mibextid=oFDknk\">Facebook<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Organiser:<\/strong> MedERA Journal of CMH Lahore Medical College &amp; IOD Lahore Pakistan <strong>Contact: <\/strong> <strong><a href=\"mailto:wajopri@gmail.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">wajopri@gmail.com<\/a>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Peer Review Week 2024 included many exciting events, including events and activities organised by a host of organisations. These are categorised under the headings below. Activities included blog posts, videos, podcasts, infographics, and more. IN-PERSON&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/?page_id=2435\">More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"parent":1452,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2435","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2435"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2546,"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2435\/revisions\/2546"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}