{"id":465,"date":"2017-05-03T12:26:47","date_gmt":"2017-05-03T11:26:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/?page_id=465"},"modified":"2017-05-03T12:26:47","modified_gmt":"2017-05-03T11:26:47","slug":"activities","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/?page_id=465","title":{"rendered":"2017 Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color:#009499;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/prw_2017-_press_release-5-sept.pdf\">Transparency in Review Is Focus for Peer Review Week 2017 <\/a><\/strong><\/span>(also available in <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/press-release-_2-weeks_final_japanese.pdf\">Japanese<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/press-release-_2-weeks_final_korean.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Korean<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/press-release-_2-weeks_final_chinese.pdf\">Simplified Chinese<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align:left;\"><span style=\"font-size:12p;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/peer-review-week-call-for-participation.pdf\"><span style=\"color:#009499;\"><strong>Community Wide Call for Participation<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align:left;\"><span style=\"color:#009499;\"><b><span style=\"font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/prw-press-release-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Peer Review Week Returns for the Third Year\u00a0<\/a><\/span><\/b><\/span>(also available in <a href=\"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/prw-press-release-2017-japanese.docx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Japanese<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/prw-press-release-2017-korean.docx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Korean<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/prw-press-release-2017-simplified-chinese.docx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Simplified Chinese<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/prw-press-release-2017_german.docx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">German)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color:#009499;font-size:13pt;\"><b><span style=\"font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;\">Under the Microscope: Transparency in Peer Review &#8211; Panel after the Peer Review Congress<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>What:<\/strong>\u00a0To kick off the week\u2019s activities, Peer Review Week organisers ran \u00a0a panel discussion as a satellite session following the Peer Review Congress<br \/>\n<strong>Where:\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.peerreviewcongress.org\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color:#ec5d73;\">Peer Review Congress<\/span><\/a>, Chicago, 10-12 September<br \/>\n<strong>When:<\/strong>\u00a0September 12, 5.30pm<br \/>\n<strong>Who:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Alice Meadows (ORCID, moderator)<\/li>\n<li>Carly Strasser (Gordon &amp; Betty Moore Foundation)<\/li>\n<li>Irene Hames (Peer review and publication ethics expert)<\/li>\n<li>Elizabeth Moylan (BMC publishing)<\/li>\n<li>Andrew Preston (Publons)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align:center;\"><strong><span style=\"color:#ec5d73;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/prw2017-panelists22.pdf\"><span style=\"color:#ec5d73;\">You can find their full biographies here.<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Watch a recorded version of the panel:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">We&#8217;re live talking <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/TransparencyInReview?src=hash\">#TransparencyInReview<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/0B6s803cXC\">https:\/\/t.co\/0B6s803cXC<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 PeerReviewWeek (@PeerRevWeek) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/PeerRevWeek\/status\/907733576283602944\">September 12, 2017<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\">\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>What else is going on during Peer Review Week?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Monday 11 September<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/fems-microbiology.org\/fems-work\/campaigns\/peer-review\/peer-review-reviewed\/\">Q&amp;A<\/a>: Peer Review reviewed: Julia Wilson, Sense about Science, 10am CET \u2013 FEMS<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publishingcampus.elsevier.com\/pages\/285\/Transparency-in-Peer-Review.html\">Webinar<\/a>: Transparency in Peer Review Process, 3pm CET \u2013 Elsevier<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/goo.gl\/forms\/dZODrU9q21tWPA6i2\">Interactive Webinar<\/a>: Preprints and Open Peer Review, 4pm CET \u2013 Academic Karma and Gigascience<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.royalsociety.org\/publishing\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Parallel publishing: what happens when two societies work together \u2013 Royal Society<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jjeditorial.com\/\">Podcast<\/a>: Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review, Podcast 1 \u2013 J&amp;J Editorial<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/fbXxmqKve1Y\">Video<\/a>: Results-Free Review &#8211; BMC<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ariessys.com\/views-and-press\/resources\/video-library\/transparency-tools\/\">Video Resource Library<\/a>:\u00a0Editorial Manager Transparency Tools \u00a0&#8211; Aries Systems<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/page\/peer-review-week-2017\">Competition<\/a>: Win \u00a350 of Amazon vouchers by entering our Peer Review Week competition &#8211; IOP Publishing<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/page\/peer-review-week-2017\">News<\/a>: ORCID becomes required for authors submitting to IOP journals &#8211; IOP Publishing<\/li>\n<li>Resources: Launching a series of new articles on <a href=\"http:\/\/editorresources.taylorandfrancisgroup.com\/\">Editor Resources<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com\/\">Author Services<\/a> \u2013 Taylor &amp; Francis<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/exchanges.wiley.com\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Welcome to Peer Review Week 2017! \u2013 Wiley<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/marketing.edanzediting.com\/acton\/media\/24638\/peer-review-week-webinars\">Webinar<\/a>:\u00a0How to Peer Review a Paper, 7pm JST \u2013 Edanz Group<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/crosstalk.cell.com\/blog\/towards-a-more-transparent-and-collaborative-review-process\">Blog post<\/a>:\u00a0Towards a more transparent and collaborative review process. &#8211; Cell Press<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.crossref.org\/blog\/making-peer-reviews-citable-discoverable-and-creditable\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Making peer reviews citable, discoverable, and creditable \u2013 Crossref<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/files\/u7140\/Peer%20Review%20poster_2017.pdf\">Poster<\/a>: An analysis of peer review cases brought to COPE from 1997-2016 \u2013 COPE<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.rsc.org\/news-events\/articles\/2017\/sep\/publons-partnership2\/\">News<\/a>: Royal Society of Chemistry partners with Publons to give peer reviewers more recognition &#8211; Royal Society of Chemistry<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/news\/biases-in-scientific-publication-a-report-from-the-2017-peer-review-congress\/1505123145\">Conference Report<\/a>: Biases in scientific publication: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress &#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-paid-peer-review-a-good-idea\">Blog post:<\/a> Is paid peer review a good idea? &#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Tuesday 12 September<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/kib.ki.se\/whatsup\/events\/lecture-why-would-and-should-i-peer-review-nele-brusselaers\">Lecture<\/a>: Why would and should I care about peer review? 12:15 CET, Karolinska Institutet<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/publons.com\/community\/awards\/2017\">Peer Review Awards<\/a>,\u00a03pm BST \/ 10am EST \u2013 Publons<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/activities\/\">Panel after the Peer Review Congress<\/a> &#8211; Under the Microscope: Transparency in Peer Review,\u00a05.30pm Central time<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.royalsociety.org\/publishing\/\">Blog post<\/a>: What transparency means to me: an author\u2019s perspective \u2013 Royal Society<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jjeditorial.com\/\">Podcast<\/a>: Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review, Podcast 2 \u2013 J&amp;J Editorial<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/page\/peer-review-week-2017\">Video<\/a>: The journey of a paper from submission to publication &#8211; IOP Publishing<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/page\/peer-review-week-2017\">Video<\/a>: A day at IOP &#8211; IOP Publishing<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.acs.org\/content\/acs\/en\/events\/reddit-science.html\">AMA<\/a>: Peer Review AMA on r\/Science with Charley Trowbridge, Director, Peer Review Operations at ACS Publications, 8am EST &#8211; ACS Publications<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.library.uq.edu.au\/library-services\/training\">Workshop<\/a>: How to be an effective reviewer: Peer reviewing for academic journals with Taylor and Francis, 12pm-2pm AEST\u00a0<span style=\"font-size:1rem;\">&#8211; University of Queensland (non-UQ registrants, include name \u201cElena Danilova\u201d in email request)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.plos.org\/plos\/2017\/09\/slice-of-transparency-in-peer-review\/\">Blog post<\/a>: To Sign or Not to Sign: A Slice of Transparency in Peer Review \u2013 PLOS<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/exchanges.wiley.com\/\">Blog post<\/a>: How transparency can abate peer review scams \u2013 Wiley<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/peer-review-week-2017\">Video<\/a>: What does good peer review look like to you? &#8211; Cambridge University Press<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org\/2017\/09\/12\/born-digital-mean-rethinking-peer-review\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Does Born-Digital Mean Rethinking Peer Review? &#8211; AAUP<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.insight.mrc.ac.uk\/2017\/09\/12\/funding-decisions-insider-insights\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Funding decisions: insider insights &#8211; Medical Research Council<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\">Blog post<\/a>: How to select peer reviewers: Advice from an expert journal editor &#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/news\/research-integrity-and-misconduct-in-science-a-report-from-the-2017-peer-review-congress\/1505205948\">Conference report<\/a>: Research integrity and misconduct in science: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/news\/quality-of-reporting-in-scientific-publications-a-report-from-the-2017-peer-review-congress\/1505174427\">Conference report<\/a>: Quality of reporting in scientific publications: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/the-need-for-transparency-in-peer-review-a-case-study\">Case study<\/a>: The need for transparency in peer review\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Wednesday 13 September<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.royalsociety.org\/publishing\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Peer review in grant applications\u00a0\u2013 Royal Society<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/page\/peer-review-week-2017\">Video<\/a>: Interview with Philip Moriarty, &#8220;Transparency in peer review&#8221; &#8211;\u00a0IOP Publishing<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/page\/peer-review-week-2017\">Blog post<\/a>: Peer reviewing conferences &#8211; IOP Publishing<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.library.uq.edu.au\/library-services\/training\">Workshop<\/a>: Writing Award-Winning Reviews, 1pm-2pm AEST &#8211; University of Queensland (non-UQ registrants, include name \u201cElena Danilova\u201d in email request)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.library.uq.edu.au\/library-services\/training\">Workshop<\/a>: Peer Reviewer training with Publons Academy, 3pm-4pm AEST\u00a0&#8211; University of Queensland (non-UQ registrants, include name \u201cElena Danilova\u201d in email request)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/exchanges.wiley.com\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Recognition for Review: Wiley&#8217;s Partnership with Publons, One Year Later \u2013 Wiley<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/marketing.edanzediting.com\/acton\/media\/24638\/peer-review-week-webinars\">Webinar<\/a>: How to Write a Peer Review Report, 7pm JST \u2013 Edanz Group<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.igi-global.com\/newsroom\">Blog post<\/a>:\u00a0Are You Protecting Your Research? &#8211; IGI Global<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/IGIGlobal\">Video<\/a>:\u00a0IGI Global Peer Review Process: Are you Ready to Share Vetted Research with the World? &#8211; IGI Global<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/crosstalk.cell.com\/blog\/what-to-do-when-your-paper-is-out-for-review\">Blog post<\/a>: What to do when your paper is out for review \u2013 Cell Press<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/news\/exploring-funding-and-grant-reviews-a-report-from-the-2017-peer-review-congress\/1505304600\">Conference report<\/a>: Exploring funding and grant reviews: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress &#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/news\/quality-of-scientific-literature-a-report-from-the-2017-peer-review-congress\/1505298081\">Conference report<\/a>: Quality of scientific literature: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-transparency-can-abate-peer-review-scams\">Blog post<\/a>: How transparency can abate peer review scams\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Thursday 14 September<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/members.orcid.org\/peer-review-week-2017-webinar\">Webinar<\/a>: Peer Review Week 2017, 10am EST &#8211; ORCID<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.resourcenter.net\/Scripts\/4Disapi07.dll\/events\/2017-webinar-5-tools-of-the-trade-for-transparency-how-journals-can-increase\/710\/\">Webinar<\/a>: Tools of the Trade for Transparency, 12pm EST &#8211; CSE<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bue.edu.eg\/index.php\/announcements\/3341-transparency-in-peer-review-and-high-impact-research-2\">Seminar<\/a>:\u00a0Transparency in Peer Review and High Impact Research, 10am CET &#8211; The British University in Egypt (BUE)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eventbrite.com\/e\/defining-transparency-in-peer-review-tickets-37490534197\">Panel with Q&amp;A<\/a>:\u00a0Defining Transparency in Peer Review, 6pm BST &#8211; F1000<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/page\/peer-review-week-2017\">Blog post<\/a>: Ethics in peer review &#8211; IOP Publishing<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/exchanges.wiley.com\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Transparent Review at the European Journal of Neuroscience: <em>experiences one year on<\/em> \u2013 Wiley<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/cope-webinar-current-issues-peer-review\">Webinar<\/a>: Current Issues in Peer Review, 4pm BST &#8211; COPE<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.igi-global.com\/newsroom\/\">Blog post<\/a>:\u00a0Trust and Truth in Transparency &#8211; IGI Global<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=z93mj0alKEg&amp;feature=youtu.be\">Seminar<\/a>: Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Knowledge Content Collaborative Efforts Among Librarians, Researchers, Publishers &amp; Content Distributors by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.igi-global.com\/affiliate\/mehdi-khosrow-pourdba\/298698\/\">Dr. Mehdi Khosrow-Pour<\/a>, IGI Global\u2019s Executive Editor &#8211; IGI Global<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/crosstalk.cell.com\/blog\/what-changed-transparency-in-a-table-to-highlight-the-value-of-peer-review\">Blog post<\/a>: What changed? Transparency in a table to highlight the value of peer review \u2013 Cell Press<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/thebiochemistblog.com\/2017\/09\/14\/peer-review-an-editor-in-chiefs-perspective\/\">Blog post<\/a>: Peer Review: an Editor-in-Chief\u2019s perspective \u2013 Biochemical Society<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/news\/post-publication-issues-and-peer-review-a-report-from-the-2017-peer-review-congress\/1505343274\">Conference report<\/a>: Post-publication issues and peer review: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress &#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/7-common-types-of-academic-peer-review\">Infographic<\/a>: 7 Common types of academic peer review\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.brighttalk.com\/search\/?q=peer+review+scams\">Webinar<\/a>: Digging deeper into peer review scams\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Friday 15 September<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/goo.gl\/forms\/LiwIlw8v9V8gBjBy1\">Webinar<\/a>: Open Peer Review: Models, Attitudes and Next Steps, 12pm CET &#8211; OpenAIRE and OpenUP<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/editorial.reviewercredits.com\/2017\/08\/29\/webinar-reviewercredits-peerreview-transparency\/\">Webinar<\/a>: What is ReviewerCredits and how can it contribute to transparency in #peerreview? 4pm CET &#8211;\u00a0University of Milan-Bicocca<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eventbrite.co.uk\/e\/peer-review-what-you-need-to-know-registration-37247190349\">Panel<\/a>: Peer Review: What You Need To Know, 3pm BST &#8211; Springer Nature<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/page\/peer-review-week-2017\">Competition<\/a>: Winner announced &#8211; IOP Publishing<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/exchanges.wiley.com\/\">Blog post<\/a>: What can publishers do to encourage and contribute to a culture of transparency? \u2013 Wiley<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.igi-global.com\/newsroom\/\">Blog Post<\/a>: Scholarly Publishing: A Look Back &#8211; IGI Global<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/peer-review-scams-what-can-journals-do-to-tackle-this-problem\">Blog post<\/a>: Peer review scams: What can journals and editors do to tackle this problem? &#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/news\/editorial-and-peer-review-process-innovations-a-report-from-the-2017-peer-review-congress\/1505460760\">Conference report<\/a>: Editorial and peer-review process innovations: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress &#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/news\/pre-publication-and-post-publication-issues-a-report-from-the-2017-peer-review-congress\/1505480222\">Conference report<\/a>: Pre-publication and post-publication issues: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/top-10-questions-authors-have-on-peer-review\">Q&amp;A<\/a>: Top 10 questions authors have on peer review\u00a0&#8211; Editage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Saturday 16 September<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.igi-global.com\/newsroom\/\">Blog<\/a>:\u00a0Understanding the Best Practices of a Peer Reviewer \u00a0&#8211; IGI Global<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Sunday 17 September<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.eventbox.ir\/peerreview-17sep2017-en\">Workshop<\/a>: Peer Review: Nuts &amp; Bolts, 10 am &#8211; 12 pm IRDT &#8211; University of Tehran<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.edanzediting.com\/content\/peer-review-essential-skill-all-researchers\">Blog post<\/a>: Peer review is an essential skill for all researchers &#8211; Edanz Group<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-456\" src=\"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/prw2017_v2.jpg?w=300\" alt=\"\" width=\"559\" height=\"403\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Transparency in Review Is Focus for Peer Review Week 2017 (also available in Japanese, Korean, and Simplified Chinese) Community Wide Call for Participation Peer Review Week Returns for the Third Year\u00a0(also available in Japanese, Korean,&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/?page_id=465\">More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-465","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=465"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/465\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.peerreviewweek.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}