- Transparency in Review Is Focus for Peer Review Week 2017 (also available in Japanese, Korean, and Simplified Chinese)
- Community Wide Call for Participation
- Peer Review Week Returns for the Third Year (also available in Japanese, Korean, Simplified Chinese and German)
Under the Microscope: Transparency in Peer Review – Panel after the Peer Review Congress
What: To kick off the week’s activities, Peer Review Week organisers ran a panel discussion as a satellite session following the Peer Review Congress
Where: Peer Review Congress, Chicago, 10-12 September
When: September 12, 5.30pm
Who:
- Alice Meadows (ORCID, moderator)
- Carly Strasser (Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation)
- Irene Hames (Peer review and publication ethics expert)
- Elizabeth Moylan (BMC publishing)
- Andrew Preston (Publons)
You can find their full biographies here.
Watch a recorded version of the panel:
We’re live talking #TransparencyInReview https://t.co/0B6s803cXC
— PeerReviewWeek (@PeerRevWeek) September 12, 2017
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
What else is going on during Peer Review Week?
Monday 11 September
- Q&A: Peer Review reviewed: Julia Wilson, Sense about Science, 10am CET – FEMS
- Webinar: Transparency in Peer Review Process, 3pm CET – Elsevier
- Interactive Webinar: Preprints and Open Peer Review, 4pm CET – Academic Karma and Gigascience
- Blog post: Parallel publishing: what happens when two societies work together – Royal Society
- Podcast: Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review, Podcast 1 – J&J Editorial
- Video: Results-Free Review – BMC
- Video Resource Library: Editorial Manager Transparency Tools – Aries Systems
- Competition: Win £50 of Amazon vouchers by entering our Peer Review Week competition – IOP Publishing
- News: ORCID becomes required for authors submitting to IOP journals – IOP Publishing
- Resources: Launching a series of new articles on Editor Resources and Author Services – Taylor & Francis
- Blog post: Welcome to Peer Review Week 2017! – Wiley
- Webinar: How to Peer Review a Paper, 7pm JST – Edanz Group
- Blog post: Towards a more transparent and collaborative review process. – Cell Press
- Blog post: Making peer reviews citable, discoverable, and creditable – Crossref
- Poster: An analysis of peer review cases brought to COPE from 1997-2016 – COPE
- News: Royal Society of Chemistry partners with Publons to give peer reviewers more recognition – Royal Society of Chemistry
- Conference Report: Biases in scientific publication: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress – Editage
- Blog post: Is paid peer review a good idea? – Editage
Tuesday 12 September
- Lecture: Why would and should I care about peer review? 12:15 CET, Karolinska Institutet
- Peer Review Awards, 3pm BST / 10am EST – Publons
- Panel after the Peer Review Congress – Under the Microscope: Transparency in Peer Review, 5.30pm Central time
- Blog post: What transparency means to me: an author’s perspective – Royal Society
- Podcast: Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review, Podcast 2 – J&J Editorial
- Video: The journey of a paper from submission to publication – IOP Publishing
- Video: A day at IOP – IOP Publishing
- AMA: Peer Review AMA on r/Science with Charley Trowbridge, Director, Peer Review Operations at ACS Publications, 8am EST – ACS Publications
- Workshop: How to be an effective reviewer: Peer reviewing for academic journals with Taylor and Francis, 12pm-2pm AEST – University of Queensland (non-UQ registrants, include name “Elena Danilova” in email request)
- Blog post: To Sign or Not to Sign: A Slice of Transparency in Peer Review – PLOS
- Blog post: How transparency can abate peer review scams – Wiley
- Video: What does good peer review look like to you? – Cambridge University Press
- Blog post: Does Born-Digital Mean Rethinking Peer Review? – AAUP
- Blog post: Funding decisions: insider insights – Medical Research Council
- Blog post: How to select peer reviewers: Advice from an expert journal editor – Editage
- Conference report: Research integrity and misconduct in science: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress – Editage
- Conference report: Quality of reporting in scientific publications: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress – Editage
- Case study: The need for transparency in peer review – Editage
Wednesday 13 September
- Blog post: Peer review in grant applications – Royal Society
- Video: Interview with Philip Moriarty, “Transparency in peer review” – IOP Publishing
- Blog post: Peer reviewing conferences – IOP Publishing
- Workshop: Writing Award-Winning Reviews, 1pm-2pm AEST – University of Queensland (non-UQ registrants, include name “Elena Danilova” in email request)
- Workshop: Peer Reviewer training with Publons Academy, 3pm-4pm AEST – University of Queensland (non-UQ registrants, include name “Elena Danilova” in email request)
- Blog post: Recognition for Review: Wiley’s Partnership with Publons, One Year Later – Wiley
- Webinar: How to Write a Peer Review Report, 7pm JST – Edanz Group
- Blog post: Are You Protecting Your Research? – IGI Global
- Video: IGI Global Peer Review Process: Are you Ready to Share Vetted Research with the World? – IGI Global
- Blog post: What to do when your paper is out for review – Cell Press
- Conference report: Exploring funding and grant reviews: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress – Editage
- Conference report: Quality of scientific literature: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress – Editage
- Blog post: How transparency can abate peer review scams – Editage
Thursday 14 September
- Webinar: Peer Review Week 2017, 10am EST – ORCID
- Webinar: Tools of the Trade for Transparency, 12pm EST – CSE
- Seminar: Transparency in Peer Review and High Impact Research, 10am CET – The British University in Egypt (BUE)
- Panel with Q&A: Defining Transparency in Peer Review, 6pm BST – F1000
- Blog post: Ethics in peer review – IOP Publishing
- Blog post: Transparent Review at the European Journal of Neuroscience: experiences one year on – Wiley
- Webinar: Current Issues in Peer Review, 4pm BST – COPE
- Blog post: Trust and Truth in Transparency – IGI Global
- Seminar: Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Knowledge Content Collaborative Efforts Among Librarians, Researchers, Publishers & Content Distributors by Dr. Mehdi Khosrow-Pour, IGI Global’s Executive Editor – IGI Global
- Blog post: What changed? Transparency in a table to highlight the value of peer review – Cell Press
- Blog post: Peer Review: an Editor-in-Chief’s perspective – Biochemical Society
- Conference report: Post-publication issues and peer review: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress – Editage
- Infographic: 7 Common types of academic peer review – Editage
- Webinar: Digging deeper into peer review scams – Editage
Friday 15 September
- Webinar: Open Peer Review: Models, Attitudes and Next Steps, 12pm CET – OpenAIRE and OpenUP
- Webinar: What is ReviewerCredits and how can it contribute to transparency in #peerreview? 4pm CET – University of Milan-Bicocca
- Panel: Peer Review: What You Need To Know, 3pm BST – Springer Nature
- Competition: Winner announced – IOP Publishing
- Blog post: What can publishers do to encourage and contribute to a culture of transparency? – Wiley
- Blog Post: Scholarly Publishing: A Look Back – IGI Global
- Blog post: Peer review scams: What can journals and editors do to tackle this problem? – Editage
- Conference report: Editorial and peer-review process innovations: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress – Editage
- Conference report: Pre-publication and post-publication issues: A report from the 2017 Peer Review Congress – Editage
- Q&A: Top 10 questions authors have on peer review – Editage
Saturday 16 September
- Blog: Understanding the Best Practices of a Peer Reviewer – IGI Global
Sunday 17 September
- Workshop: Peer Review: Nuts & Bolts, 10 am – 12 pm IRDT – University of Tehran
- Blog post: Peer review is an essential skill for all researchers – Edanz Group
